- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 10:53:29 +0100
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>, "public-fedsocweb@w3.org" <public-fedsocweb@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <63C33D59-9A9F-4571-B6C9-FE218792CBC2@bblfish.net>
On 7 Nov 2012, at 18:19, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The TPAC meeting in Lyon was I think quite clearly a great success. So to follow up on this the WebID XG is organising a Teleconf on the W3C system to help move things to the next stage.
> I got the following slot for this Friday:
>
> Fridays 15:00-16:00 UTC (10:00am-11:00am Boston local)
> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 93243 ("WEBID")
> 30 participants
> other timezones: http://timeanddate.com/s/2a4w
> ( there are phone numbers for other parts of the world, does anyone have a list of those? )
There are no more teleconf numbers in the rest of the world, but that's ok because you can use free voice over IP calling to connect.
This is explained here:
http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP
There are a number of VOIP clients around. For example on apple there is
http://icanblink.com/
>
> Here is the proposed agenda for this teleconf:
>
> 1) Overview of what happened at TPAC
> The summary is online, but there are some things that are difficult to put in writing.
> http://www.w3.org/community/rww/wiki/TPAC-Lyon-2012
> ( eg. how the W3C process works and why it is useful )
>
> 2) The LDP group has to create a note laying some basic principles for what an
> Access Control System should look like, but they don't want to get sidetracked in
> an implementeable spec. Should we as part of the RWW take on to put something together here?
>
> 3) The WebID definition was changed at the meeting, but this lead to a lot of pushback on the mailing list. I proposed this as a compromise
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2012Nov/0020.html
> Is this an improvement?
>
> 4) Most important: is this date ok to continue having WebID/RWW/SocialWeb meetings for
> everybody? We could have those topics take turns so that we don't get tired with the same topic, and as this would help us enlarge our horizons.
>
>
> Henry
>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 09:54:04 UTC