- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:57:56 +0100
- To: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>, "public-fedsocweb@w3.org" <public-fedsocweb@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <A2C44E97-46EF-4B39-9314-180D0E24AAEA@bblfish.net>
On 9 Nov 2012, at 10:53, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:
>
> On 7 Nov 2012, at 18:19, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The TPAC meeting in Lyon was I think quite clearly a great success. So to follow up on this the WebID XG is organising a Teleconf on the W3C system to help move things to the next stage.
>> I got the following slot for this Friday:
>>
>> Fridays 15:00-16:00 UTC (10:00am-11:00am Boston local)
>> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 93243 ("WEBID")
>> 30 participants
>> other timezones: http://timeanddate.com/s/2a4w
>> ( there are phone numbers for other parts of the world, does anyone have a list of those? )
>
> There are no more teleconf numbers in the rest of the world, but that's ok because you can use free voice over IP calling to connect.
> This is explained here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP
>
> There are a number of VOIP clients around. For example on apple there is
> http://icanblink.com/
I forgot to mention that we are also on IRC
irc://irc.w3.org:6665/%23webid
which is key to getting this all to work correctly.
>
>
>
>>
>> Here is the proposed agenda for this teleconf:
>>
>> 1) Overview of what happened at TPAC
>> The summary is online, but there are some things that are difficult to put in writing.
>> http://www.w3.org/community/rww/wiki/TPAC-Lyon-2012
>> ( eg. how the W3C process works and why it is useful )
>>
>> 2) The LDP group has to create a note laying some basic principles for what an
>> Access Control System should look like, but they don't want to get sidetracked in
>> an implementeable spec. Should we as part of the RWW take on to put something together here?
>>
>> 3) The WebID definition was changed at the meeting, but this lead to a lot of pushback on the mailing list. I proposed this as a compromise
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2012Nov/0020.html
>> Is this an improvement?
>>
>> 4) Most important: is this date ok to continue having WebID/RWW/SocialWeb meetings for
>> everybody? We could have those topics take turns so that we don't get tired with the same topic, and as this would help us enlarge our horizons.
>>
>>
>> Henry
>>
>> Social Web Architect
>> http://bblfish.net/
>>
>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 14:58:34 UTC