- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 18:53:44 +0000
- To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Max Froumentin <max@froumentin.net>, Wendy Hall <wh@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Team Community Process <team-community-process@w3.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, public-webhistory@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAK-qy=4vByF_fcF0sB3TuL9BrQV4J9KUnFE+9VMJrrWo1ZbCmw@mail.gmail.com>
+MaxF, Wendy On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 at 18:33, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote: > Agreee Dan - how to tell the W3C algorithm > Ian's already noticed. Thanks, Ian! I think it's a pity to fully close CGs just to make it easier to find the most active ones. Seems more like a UI issue than a process thing. But either way this is a helpful nudge. Time flies. We should make an effort to be more active! I don't think I even sent an intro here... I got into the webhistory topic around 2009 or so when I worked at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and was slightly mortified to realize I was lined up to teach students who were mostly younger than the web. And even that moment is 13 years ago now too. At the time I was delighted to realize that you could run an old version of TimBL's WorldWideWeb NextStep/OpenStep browser on VMWare if you could get your hands on (virtual and real) disks for OpenStep, etc. You can even try to build the codebase, although we never got that working, some libwww issues (ObjectiveC version I think). But you could at least click on .nib files to bring up the NeXT Interface Builder, and even drag bits of the browser UI around and pretend you're helping TimBL invent the Web. I talked to some Apple / NeXT obsessives about whether the .nib interface definitions could be brought up to date, version by version, so they'd run in modern iOS/OSX dev tools. A little known fact being that most iphone apps are created in the successor to the tool TimBL used back in the day. It might be good if Apple could give away licenses to the old OpenStep versions so that schools, museums, etc could run copies of it in virtual machines, without worrying about ending up in court. They'd probably need to worry about security, and HTTP 1.1 Host: headers, TLS etc instead. But even without accessing modern web content it is fascinating to play with the original browser. I found it extremely wiki-like. Messy screencast test here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb_hu3k0KWw (made in 2012, never circulated here!). Oh, just found this too, a talk I gave at Cern for the 20 years of the Web, it talks about FOAF and the earlier ideas for semantics in the Web. And TimBL's unsung artwork, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgtbbJctXNk What else? Wendy and friends arranged a History of the Web event at the Web conference last year - https://www2022.thewebconf.org/cfp/special/history/ - it would be good to know what future plans there are. Wendy? :) TimBL and I have talked about webhistory on and off over the years. There were some files from Cern that needed sorting (personal vs historical, I guess). I remember recommending something around the FUSE virtual filesystem for the old disk format, afaik it worked, ... but I forget what happened next. Tim? :) What should we be doing to be more organized? Every passing year, more old sites dissapear, ... more people leave our communities forever. Talking of, hope you are all well! Dan
Received on Monday, 6 March 2023 18:54:34 UTC