Re: Agenda + updates for WebFonts F2F Sep. 3rd

Map pin!

Dropped pin
Near Tokyo Bay Shuttle 01 National Museum of Emerging Science and Innovation, 2-chōme-3-3-6 Aomi, Koto City, Tōkyō-to 135-0064, Japan
https://goo.gl/maps/vSjUoEBR6HLGcgCBA

Jason


Jason Pamental
401.743.4406

jason@rwt.io
http://rwt.io


> On Sep 3, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Ken Lunde <lunde@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> Vladimir,
> 
> I just arrived. How do we get into the locked building?
> 
> -- Ken
> 
> On Sep 3, 2019, at 09:29, Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello WG,
>>  
>> Date and time: September 3rd, 2019, 10 AM – 6 PM Japan local time
>> (UTC: Sep. 3, 00:00 – 08:00; US Pacific: Sep. 2, 6 PM – 2 AM next day; US Eastern: Sep. 2, 9 PM – 5 AM)
>>  
>> Location
>> Miraikan National Museum of Emerging Science and Innovation,
>> 2-3-6 Aomi, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan (Tel.: +81-3-3570-9151)
>> https://www.miraikan.jst.go.jp/en/guide/route/
>> Room Jupiter, (7th floor) – hosted by ATypI
>>  
>> Attendance
>> The following WG members have confirmed their F2F attendance:
>> Vladimir Levantovsky, Roderick Sheeter, Ken Lunde, Jason Pamental, Garret Rieger, Chris Lilley, Myles Maxfield, Ned Holbrook.
>>  
>> Teleconferencing: IRC and Zoom meeting facilities.
>> Zoom: https://monotype.zoom.us/j/979270847
>> IRC: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/webfonts or http://irc.w3.org/?channels=webfonts
>>  
>> Agenda:
>> 1.       Introductions / Administrivia (15 min)
>> - Charter review: timeline, deliverables [0];
>> - Review open action items [1];
>> - Future WG telcon scheduling;
>> 2.       PFE Evaluation Report topics (~ 1 hour)
>> - Summary of work done to date: 
>>    Analysis of existing solutions [2, 3];
>>    Font data analysis:  [4-7] (also see original email items, unfortunately web archive doesn’t preserve inline images);
>> - Discussion of the proposed PFE approaches: binary patch-based, byte-range, hybrid (including modified hybrid approach) [2, 8-10]
>> 3.       Planning / future work items (~ 2 hours)
>> - Performance analysis framework of proposed PFE approaches [11] (~ 30 min):
>>    Languages / technologies for framework to use;
>>    Repo location
>> - Simulation Planning (including implementation steps / timeline / contributors ~ 1 hour):
>>    Patch-based subset font loading (including hybrid approach variants);
>>    Patch & subset protocol design [12];
>>    HTTP range request font loading (font preprocessor and loading simulation) [8];
>>    Unicode-range font loading simulation;
>> - Input data set / Font corpus (< 30 min):
>>    Ways to acquire input data / page view data set;
>>    Font contributions
>> 
>> (Lunch break ~ 1 hour)
>> 
>> 4.       Additional items for discussion (~ 1 hour 30 min)::
>> - Variable fonts and PFE;
>> - Value of PFE for simple & complex scripts;
>> - Harfbuzz subsetter;
>> 5.       AOB
>> 6.       Dinner (TBD)
>>  
>>  
>> Thank you,
>> Vlad
>>  
>>  
>> References:
>> [0] WebFonts WG charter: https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/webfonts-2018.html
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/open
>> [2] Existing solutions notes (Google): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AQ2VwiVwF77H2h_nuDHR1A5hRyGlpyIQYpYodMtEz1w/edit
>> [3] Existing solutions notes (Adobe): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kGH8tsoujDqaHD4GTAwHr_AXocUjdJ5umw8fwRKa9TY/edit
>> [4] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2019Feb/0011.html
>> [5] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2019Feb/0012.html
>> [6] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2019Aug/0000.html
>> [7] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2019Aug/0003.html
>> [8] http://www.w3.org/2019/04/Maxfield-Streamable-Fonts.key
>> [9] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2019Aug/0023.html
>> [10] https://www.w3.org/2019/08/19-webfonts-minutes.html
>> [11] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kx62tpy5hGIbHh6tHMAryon9Sgye--W_IsHTeCMlmEo/edit
>> [12] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DJ6VkUEZS2kvYZemIoX4fjCgqFXAtlRjpMlkOvblSts/edit
>>