- From: Roderick Sheeter <rsheeter@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:59:16 -0700
- To: WebFonts WG <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABscrrF_uy5wSjhfroZfYe2unudAC+BEBQdbVgduv8qv1pM8+w@mail.gmail.com>
https://www.w3.org/2016/04/06-webfonts-minutes.html [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - WebFonts Working Group Teleconference 06 Apr 2016 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2016/04/06-webfonts-irc Attendees Present Vlad, RSheeter, behdad, kuettel, kenlundeadobe, jfkthame Regrets Chair vlad Scribe rsheeter Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Mugshots 2. [5]Action Items 3. [6]Test Suite 4. [7]In Your Face at ATypI * [8]Summary of Action Items * [9]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ pedestal: vlad <behdad> yo <scribe> scribenick: rsheeter hey Mugshots Looking for pictures with color and awesomeness people Action Items Vlad: mobile perf? (which action ?) kuettel: started, looks good for woff2. Need to capture and share. action-116? <trackbot> action-116 -- David Kuettel to Decoder performance analysis on mobile devices -- due 2016-04-06 -- OPEN <trackbot> [10]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/116 [10] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/116 Vlad: A visual explanation of overall time consumed (load, decompress, etc) would be nice to have (discussion of what data we want and how we might obtain it; item due date pushed out) action-172? <trackbot> action-172 -- Chris Lilley to Register font media types -- due 2016-04-30 -- OPEN <trackbot> [11]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/172 [11] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/172 Vlad: seems to be moving along nicely action-186? <trackbot> action-186 -- Roderick Sheeter to Try time (decode) and size for null glyf/loca xform vs regular vs woff1 -- due 2016-03-16 -- OPEN <trackbot> [12]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/186 [12] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/186 Me: Have first draft but suspicious of one set of #'s, wnat to poke more before publishing action-199? <trackbot> action-199 -- Khaled Hosny Ghetas to Investigate how we actually verify at tests, particularly how we verify internal handling. -- due 2016-03-30 -- OPEN <trackbot> [13]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/199 [13] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/199 (no update, push date for now) Test Suite mustRejectInvalidBase128 mustNotRejectIncorrectTotalSize [14]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent [14] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent mustLoadFontCollection - test looks fine; might be worth adding a note that no UA actually supports at this time Vlad: might be good to discuss at TPAC mustNotRejectGlyfSizeMismatch [15]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-Decoder [15] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-Decoder mustReconstructLSBs mustLoadFontCollection - I read the test as meaning it would be OK to unshare the tables as long as the result was a valid collection. Maybe clarify that there should be no change in which tables are/are not shared? jfkthame: maybe that's OK specwise even if it's an inefficient implementation [16]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-Format [16] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-Format reservedFlagsMustBeZero transformFlagsMustBeSet I think there was discussion of how this would actually be verified. Maybe one simple way would be just by looking at the transformed length and flags? - it should have these X flags and be Y bytes smaller type of deal. (discussion of The Validator) [17]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-AuthoringTool [17] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-AuthoringTool mustCheckLSBAllGlyfTables, mustNotApplyLSBTransformForOTC Marked for attention but seem fine Vlad: because I snuck them in while you were not looking ... That leaves us with just implementation for tests ) In Your Face at ATypI Vlad: ATypI will be good for our group. TPAC will offer a chance to chat with other groups, such as with CSS about fragments and collections. ... and the wooorld of tomorrow ... js api for deeper access to fonts, subsets, loading, etc might be a fun area to explore. ... Further suggestions welcome, including going outside current charter behdad: maybe something about variations, css, better compressing them? kuettel: unicode-range issues might be fun to chat with css group about ... so are we definitely doing both? (atypi, tpac) vlad: strongly recommended ... last call Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [18]scribe.perl version 1.144 ([19]CVS log) $Date: 2016/04/06 20:58:14 $ __________________________________________________________ [18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [19] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ Scribe.perl diagnostic output [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.] This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144 of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34 Check for newer version at [20]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ scribe/ [20] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found ScribeNick: rsheeter Inferring Scribes: rsheeter Default Present: Vlad, RSheeter, behdad, kuettel, kenlundeadobe Present: Vlad RSheeter behdad kuettel kenlundeadobe jfkthame Found Date: 06 Apr 2016 Guessing minutes URL: [21]http://www.w3.org/2016/04/06-webfonts-minutes. html People with action items: [21] http://www.w3.org/2016/04/06-webfonts-minutes.html WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. [End of [22]scribe.perl diagnostic output] [22] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2016 20:59:45 UTC