- From: Roderick Sheeter <rsheeter@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:59:16 -0700
- To: WebFonts WG <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABscrrF_uy5wSjhfroZfYe2unudAC+BEBQdbVgduv8qv1pM8+w@mail.gmail.com>
https://www.w3.org/2016/04/06-webfonts-minutes.html
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
WebFonts Working Group Teleconference
06 Apr 2016
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2016/04/06-webfonts-irc
Attendees
Present
Vlad, RSheeter, behdad, kuettel, kenlundeadobe, jfkthame
Regrets
Chair
vlad
Scribe
rsheeter
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Mugshots
2. [5]Action Items
3. [6]Test Suite
4. [7]In Your Face at ATypI
* [8]Summary of Action Items
* [9]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
pedestal: vlad
<behdad> yo
<scribe> scribenick: rsheeter
hey
Mugshots
Looking for pictures with color and awesomeness people
Action Items
Vlad: mobile perf? (which action ?)
kuettel: started, looks good for woff2. Need to capture and
share.
action-116?
<trackbot> action-116 -- David Kuettel to Decoder performance
analysis on mobile devices -- due 2016-04-06 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [10]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/116
[10] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/116
Vlad: A visual explanation of overall time consumed (load,
decompress, etc) would be nice to have
(discussion of what data we want and how we might obtain it;
item due date pushed out)
action-172?
<trackbot> action-172 -- Chris Lilley to Register font media
types -- due 2016-04-30 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [11]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/172
[11] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/172
Vlad: seems to be moving along nicely
action-186?
<trackbot> action-186 -- Roderick Sheeter to Try time (decode)
and size for null glyf/loca xform vs regular vs woff1 -- due
2016-03-16 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [12]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/186
[12] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/186
Me: Have first draft but suspicious of one set of #'s, wnat to
poke more before publishing
action-199?
<trackbot> action-199 -- Khaled Hosny Ghetas to Investigate how
we actually verify at tests, particularly how we verify
internal handling. -- due 2016-03-30 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [13]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/199
[13] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/199
(no update, push date for now)
Test Suite
mustRejectInvalidBase128
mustNotRejectIncorrectTotalSize
[14]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent
[14] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent
mustLoadFontCollection - test looks fine; might be worth adding
a note that no UA actually supports at this time
Vlad: might be good to discuss at TPAC
mustNotRejectGlyfSizeMismatch
[15]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-Decoder
[15] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-Decoder
mustReconstructLSBs
mustLoadFontCollection
- I read the test as meaning it would be OK to unshare the
tables as long as the result was a valid collection. Maybe
clarify that there should be no change in which tables are/are
not shared?
jfkthame: maybe that's OK specwise even if it's an inefficient
implementation
[16]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-Format
[16] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-Format
reservedFlagsMustBeZero
transformFlagsMustBeSet
I think there was discussion of how this would actually be
verified. Maybe one simple way would be just by looking at the
transformed length and flags? - it should have these X flags
and be Y bytes smaller type of deal.
(discussion of The Validator)
[17]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-AuthoringTool
[17] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-AuthoringTool
mustCheckLSBAllGlyfTables, mustNotApplyLSBTransformForOTC
Marked for attention but seem fine
Vlad: because I snuck them in while you were not looking
... That leaves us with just implementation for tests )
In Your Face at ATypI
Vlad: ATypI will be good for our group. TPAC will offer a
chance to chat with other groups, such as with CSS about
fragments and collections.
... and the wooorld of tomorrow
... js api for deeper access to fonts, subsets, loading, etc
might be a fun area to explore.
... Further suggestions welcome, including going outside
current charter
behdad: maybe something about variations, css, better
compressing them?
kuettel: unicode-range issues might be fun to chat with css
group about
... so are we definitely doing both? (atypi, tpac)
vlad: strongly recommended
... last call
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [18]scribe.perl version
1.144 ([19]CVS log)
$Date: 2016/04/06 20:58:14 $
__________________________________________________________
[18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[19] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Scribe.perl diagnostic output
[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144 of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34
Check for newer version at [20]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/
scribe/
[20] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/
Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)
Found ScribeNick: rsheeter
Inferring Scribes: rsheeter
Default Present: Vlad, RSheeter, behdad, kuettel, kenlundeadobe
Present: Vlad RSheeter behdad kuettel kenlundeadobe jfkthame
Found Date: 06 Apr 2016
Guessing minutes URL: [21]http://www.w3.org/2016/04/06-webfonts-minutes.
html
People with action items:
[21] http://www.w3.org/2016/04/06-webfonts-minutes.html
WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.
[End of [22]scribe.perl diagnostic output]
[22] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2016 20:59:45 UTC