- From: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:43:32 -0700
- To: David Kuettel <kuettel@google.com>, "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
On 11/04/14 2:05 PM, David Kuettel wrote: > Interestingly enough, the more tables that I look for, the more I find. > For example, FontLab's Glossary page documents a ton of optional font > tables: http://blog.fontlab.com/info/ e.g. TSI1..TSIV and many more. The 'TS__' tables are all Microsoft source tool tables, and as such not something that should be included in web fonts. Or, put it another way, if someone is shoving source tables into a web font, saving a couple of bytes on tag name optimisation isn't really a relevant efficiency. JH
Received on Friday, 11 April 2014 21:44:18 UTC