- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:37:28 +0200
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- CC: Vladimir Levantovsky <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>, <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 2:55:09 AM, John wrote: JD> Hi Vladimir, >> We also need to finalize our conference call schedule. So far, I >> believe the latest proposal has been to hold weekly conference calls >> on Wednesday, alternating the call times to accommodate time zone >> differences between different continents JD> The day and times work fine for me. Would it make sense to fix the JD> times based on a given locale (e.g. Boston time), since Europe does JD> seasonal time changes at slightly different points during the year? The times will in practice be tied to Boston since that is where the telephone bridge is physically located. >> 4) Develop test cases for web fonts: >> - develop test methodology and decide whether it is appropriate to >> require the presence of human observer, at least for some test >> cases; >> - develop the test cases and design / collect / donate / acquire >> (as we see appropriate) the necessary resources for web font >> test suite (e.g. fonts, etc.). JD> I would add here that I think we need to consider both tests for JD> tools that produce WOFF fonts and tests for user agents that load them. Yes, clearly. These are different conformance categories. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:37:55 UTC