- From: Schalk Neethling <sneethling@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:13:23 +0200
- To: Ruth John <rjohn@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Lea Verou <lea@verou.me>, Mason Freed <masonfreed@google.com>, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@google.com>, Kadir Topal <kadirtopal@google.com>, public-webdx@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAKzODzFfZLJh+Ywv0SMV2FhAyngb8NXHxGjR5AdVTciqN-3xwg@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks, Ruth! I added some custom CSS to increase the hit area for the radio buttons and hide the progress indicator. https://survey.alchemer.com/s3/7243449/MDN-Web-Components-Short-Survey On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:07 AM Ruth John <rjohn@mozilla.com> wrote: > Thanks everyone - and thanks for the changes Schalk! > > I've modified Custom SVG elements to Custom SVG/MathML elements as per the > discussion. > > The list is randomly ordered for each view. Another option is I can turn > this off and group like items in the list to make it a bit more cohesive. > > We're just looking into hiding the progress at the bottom. Whilst I > generally agree with progress indicators on surveys, it is redundant here > and so I think misleading. > > --- > Ruth John > MDN Content > Mozilla Corporation > rjohn@mozilla.com > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 8:58 PM Schalk Neethling <sneethling@mozilla.com> > wrote: > >> Hey Lea, >> >> I had a look at the feedback on the PR. Most relate to the survey form, >> which is handled in Alchemer. >> You can see a live preview of this here: >> https://survey.alchemer.com/s3/7243449/MDN-Web-Components-Short-Survey >> I hope that helps, as we do not have a live preview for the PR. >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:53 PM Schalk Neethling <sneethling@mozilla.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the feedback, everyone. I have not looked at everything, but >>> I wanted to answer these from Mason quickly: >>> >>> > - The order of the items is random. Is it *randomized*, i.e. >>> different for each survey taker? (That would be good, if so.) >>> > - The hit boxes for the radio buttons are small, which slows down the >>> survey if you're using a mouse. I don't know if this is fixable given the >>> infrastructure, but it'd be nice to do if possible. >>> > - The 0-100% indicator stays at 0% even as you move to question 2. >>> Since it's a one-screen survey, maybe that indicator isn't needed? >>> >>> On the first one. Ruth might have set it to randomize. I will >>> double-check. As you liked the idea of having it randomized, I will leave >>> it randomized if that is the case. The second and third are constraints of >>> the tool we use. With that said, for the second one, I believe I can add a >>> bit of custom CSS to the form inside Alchemer. I've attached a screenshot >>> showing the larger hit-area. I also set the cursor to pointer so it is >>> easier to see when your cursor enters the hit-area. Let me know your >>> thoughts. >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 7:29 PM Lea Verou <lea@verou.me> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi there, >>>> >>>> I just left a few comments in the PR as well :) >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Lea >>>> -- >>>> *Lea Verou* >>>> 👩🏽 (she/her) >>>> >>>> Web standards (W3C TAG, CSS WG), Usability research (MIT CSAIL), Open >>>> Source >>>> >>>> 🔗 https://lea.verou.me >>>> 🐦 @leaverou >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mar 22, 2023, at 13:04, Mason Freed <masonfreed@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks Brian, I replied to your comment on the thread. TL;DR I do think >>>> we should modify the SVG item to "Custom SVG/MathML elements", but I don't >>>> think we should add a ton of detail to each item. >>>> >>>> Thanks Ruth for setting up the survey. Generally it looks good to me. I >>>> have a few comments, many of which might be "working as intended": >>>> - The order of the items is random. Is it *randomized*, i.e. different >>>> for each survey taker? (That would be good, if so.) >>>> - The hit boxes for the radio buttons are small, which slows down the >>>> survey if you're using a mouse. I don't know if this is fixable given the >>>> infrastructure, but it'd be nice to do if possible. >>>> - The 0-100% indicator stays at 0% even as you move to question 2. >>>> Since it's a one-screen survey, maybe that indicator isn't needed? >>>> >>>> Again, I'm ok as-is, if all of these are just for the preview, or not >>>> changeable. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Mason >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:47 AM Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm not specifically asking to hit the brakes here or anything, but I >>>>> left some comments on >>>>> https://github.com/web-platform-dx/developer-research/issues/13 which >>>>> this is based on I guess. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 12:30 PM Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@google.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +Mason Freed <masonfreed@google.com> can you give it a spin and see >>>>>> if it all looks right to you? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 1:05 PM Kadir Topal <kadirtopal@google.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you Ruth! That looks good to me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --Kadir >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 12:19 PM Ruth John <rjohn@mozilla.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We've set up the web components survey ready to go - there's some >>>>>>>> previews in the pr here https://github.com/mdn/yari/pull/8466 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can also check out the survey here >>>>>>>> https://survey.alchemer.com/s3/7243449/MDN-Web-Components-Short-Survey >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Take a look and let me know if you have any suggestions for >>>>>>>> modifications - I'd ideally like to get this live on Monday (running for a >>>>>>>> week), displaying for 5% of users within the MDN web/ section. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Ruth >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> Ruth John >>>>>>>> MDN Content >>>>>>>> Mozilla Corporation >>>>>>>> rjohn@mozilla.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: bkardell.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Schalk Neethling >>> Staff community manager - MDN Web Docs, Mozilla, Mozilla >>> developer.mozilla.org/ >>> | sneethling@mozilla.com <sneethling@mozilla.com> >>> <http://github.com/schalkneethling> <http://twitter.com/schalkneethling> >>> [image: Green] Please consider your environmental responsibility. >>> Before printing this e-mail message, ask yourself whether you really need a >>> hard copy. >>> >>> Create your own email signature >>> <https://www.wisestamp.com/create-own-email-signature/?utm_source=promotion&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=create_your_own&srcid=> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Schalk Neethling >> Staff community manager - MDN Web Docs, Mozilla, Mozilla >> developer.mozilla.org/ >> | sneethling@mozilla.com <sneethling@mozilla.com> >> <http://github.com/schalkneethling> <http://twitter.com/schalkneethling> >> [image: Green] Please consider your environmental responsibility. Before >> printing this e-mail message, ask yourself whether you really need a hard >> copy. >> >> Create your own email signature >> <https://www.wisestamp.com/create-own-email-signature/?utm_source=promotion&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=create_your_own&srcid=> >> > -- Schalk Neethling Staff community manager - MDN Web Docs, Mozilla, Mozilla developer.mozilla.org/ | sneethling@mozilla.com <sneethling@mozilla.com> <http://github.com/schalkneethling> <http://twitter.com/schalkneethling> [image: Green] Please consider your environmental responsibility. Before printing this e-mail message, ask yourself whether you really need a hard copy. Create your own email signature <https://www.wisestamp.com/create-own-email-signature/?utm_source=promotion&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=create_your_own&srcid=>
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2023 09:13:49 UTC