Re: Should we do a call Monday re Last Call?

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:

> So let's keep it to discussion on the mailing list and hope we get
> consensus - including the people from outside the WG who have raised
> bugs during Last Call.
>
>  After May 20th, I'll begin compiling a draft status of all bugs using
> some automated tools on top of Bugzilla (as we need to send that in via
> email to W3C to get out of Last Call).
>

Harry,

I think you're rushing things if you think we're ready to exit last call
and proceed to Call for Implementations. That alone is worth discussing
with the group if you are attempting to advocate that path.


>
> I recommend we use the telecon if we have some significant disagreement
> post-May 20th we can't work out on the mailing list, but +1 for more
> time to work things out.
>
>   cheers,
>     harry
>
>
>
>
> On 05/15/2014 04:15 PM, GALINDO Virginie wrote:
> > +1 on (3)
> > No call, just mails (and consensus)…
> > Regards,
> > Virginie
> >
> > From: Richard Barnes [mailto:rlb@ipv.sx]
> > Sent: jeudi 15 mai 2014 15:24
> > To: Ryan Sleevi
> > Cc: Harry Halpin; public-webcrypto@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: Should we do a call Monday re Last Call?
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com<mailto:
> sleevi@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On May 15, 2014 1:53 AM, "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@w3.org<mailto:
> hhalpin@w3.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >> In good news, the public seems to have noticed the API :) In bad news,
> >> we have to resolve all the bugs raised by May 20th over the next few
> >> weeks. Ryan's done a tremendous amount of work responding.
> >>
> >> There's been a few bugs raised that could require a call since there
> >> seems to be some disagreement. In particular, there's a few substantial
> >> disagreements over the bugs filed by INRIA over oracle attacks, Rich
> >> Salz's specifics re "recommendation" (and my and Vijay's proposals to
> >> deal with it), and the like. While many of these are repeats of issues
> >> we've already discussed at length, it may be useful to revisit in light
> >> of public comments.
> >>
> >> Would people prefer to:
> >>
> >> 1) Not do a call and keep discussing over mailing list, revisiting the
> >> possibility of a telco for consensus after May 20th?
> >>
> >> 2) Do a call on the 19th to see if we can reach consensus over telco?
> >>
> >> 3) Not do a call and keep discussing over mailing list, try to do a
> >> consensus over alternatives without any call over the mailing list after
> >> May 20th?
> >>
> >>   cheers,
> >>       harry
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I vote 3.
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees
> and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or
> disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable
> for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
> > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission
> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a
> transmitted virus
> >
>
>