- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:32:48 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Lofton, Thanks for your wording. It looks good to me. The second proposed reply is about CSS I guess ? Thanks Thierry Lofton Henderson wrote: > Hi WG -- > > Here is a proposed reply to 1st of his two comments. Feel free to > recommend improvements. We'll discuss and approve/revise next > Wednesday. (I'm working on 2nd proposed reply) > > -Lofton. > > ===== start ===== > At 11:44 AM 6/20/2009 +0200, Innovimax SARL wrote: > >> == moving forward with XML Schema or Relax NG == >> Sticking to DTD to define a XML dialect is neither sufficient neither >> a way to widespread the use of this XML dialect. For that, I ask the >> WG to consider providing normative XML Schema and/or Relax NG schema >> of the XCF model. It will help adoption especially because XCF uses >> Namespaces. > > Thank you for your comments during the WebCGM 2nd Last Call Working > Draft (LCWD) review. > > The WebCGM Working Group (WG) agrees that WebCGM could potentially > benefit by addition of a normative schema -- XML Schema or Relax NG. > Unfortunately, this proposal is beyond the scope of this 2nd LCWD > review, and it is deemed to be too late in the WebCGM 2.1 development > cycle. Ideally, such a proposal would have been included in the WebCGM > 2.1 Requirements, or before 1st LCWD review at latest. The > implementation of such a proposal would involve major disruption of the > WebCGM 2.1 text -- removal of the DTD and complete rewriting of Chapter > 4 (at least). Since it does not address an error in the specification, > or a serious defect, or violation of any W3C requirement, the WG > believes that the proposal should be postponed until a future WebCGM > development cycle. > > As an interim step, the WG thinks that a non-normative Technical Note, > separate from the progression of 2.1 WebCGM, might be an interesting > approach. The WG would also welcome an initial contribution, if you > have interest in making such. > ===== end ===== > >
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2009 20:48:54 UTC