- From: David Cruikshank <dvdcruikshank@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:49:11 -0800
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <8fbe8a40901191449w3f2e2cc8ta2040dbfa74e4171@mail.gmail.com>
On the other hand there isn't any analogous value for raster intensity...so it has to return the intensity value that was set. dave On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:38 PM, David Cruikshank <dvdcruikshank@gmail.com>wrote: > Just shooting from the hip here, but I would expect the return value to > correspond to the common value of the attribute in CGM. We introduced these > "intensity" or percentage values WebCGM, but for simplicity I think the > return should probably be the value that makes sense when you consider the > same attribute value in CGM. > > Just my thoughts. > > Dave > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>wrote: > >> ISSUE: does getStyleProperty have to return the SP in the same form in >> which it was set? >> >> Ref: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/0005.html >> >> Discussion: Benoit asks the simple question, which we apparently have >> never addressed... >> >> At 10:59 AM 1/7/2009 -0500, Bezaire, Benoit wrote: >> >> [....] I wonder if the implementation has to return the exact same string >> that was used to set the attribute. >> >> Example for stroke-weight: setStyleProperty("stroke-weight", "200%"), >> getStyleProperty("stroke-weight") returns 0.5 (assuming original was 0.25). >> >> >> Question 1: do any of our past minutes or email address this? >> >> Question 2: has anyone implemented yet? What have you implemented? >> >> RECOMMENDATION: (none yet.) >> >> ### end ### >> >> >
Received on Monday, 19 January 2009 22:49:47 UTC