RE: [Agenda] WebCGM telecon: Thursday, 20 November 2008 (DRAFT)

At 09:59 AM 11/20/2008 -0500, Bezaire, Benoit wrote:

>[...]
>I can't make it. I have another important meeting to attend.

Since all of the "Active new threads" have come from you, what would you 
propose that we do with them?  Resolve them in your absence?  Or postpone 
them till you can be present?


>Could we put 'locus' in the Glossary section?

IMO, it's not necessary -- WebCGM has gotten along without it for 10 years 
(in ch.6 Profile).  But I don't much care.

If someone will take the action to propose a definition, and it is approved 
by the WG, then I guess it will go in.  (As Google shows, almost any math 
glossary defines it.)

-Lofton.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org
>[mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lofton Henderson
>Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 5:25 PM
>To: WebCGM WG
>Subject: [Agenda] WebCGM telecon: Thursday, 20 November 2008 (DRAFT)
>
>
>
>Hello WebCGM WG,
>
>If you can't attend this week's WG teleconference, please reply (to
>list) with "regrets".
>
>Main topic:  approval of LC Review resolutions.
>
>WebCGM, Thursday, 20 November 2008, 11:00am-12:30pm ET (logistics below,
>following agenda)
>
>Previous minutes
>=====
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0019.html
>
>Agenda
>=====
>
>Chair:  Lofton
>
>Scribe:  tbd
>(See:
>[0]  http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/scribing-guidelines.html
>)
>
>1.) roll call 11:00am ET,
>         -- agenda:  additions?
>         -- any routine WG business?
>
>2.) Al Gilman questions & remarks [1]
>         -- for next telecon?
>
>3.) LC Review completion and DoC [2]
>         -- proposed completion around 04-dec
>         -- comments logged so far [2]
>         -- endorsement of Proposed Resolution for #1, #2, #3 [2]
>
>4.) I18N comments [7]
>         -- editorial comments #1 & #2 [8]
>         -- comments #3 & #4 -- normalization rules [9]
>         -- comments #5 & #6 -- TBD.
>
>5.) Active new threads:
>         -- process in (1st) LC, or after 1st LC closure?
>         -- getObjectExtent "abstract locus" [4]
>         -- getObjectExtent include 'viewcontext'? [5]
>         -- setView() rectangles w/ different aspect ratio [6]
>         -- setView() invalid or extreme rectangle  [3]
>
>6.) Status & Forecast for test suite and implementations
>         -- feedback from implementors & test writers
>         -- anticipation of further comments
>         -- Potential content, timing, and possibility of January F2F
>
>7.) Next telecon:  04 December 2008
>
>8.) Adjourn
>
>[1]
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Nov/0023.html
>[2] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html
>
>[3]
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Nov/0036.html
>[4]
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Nov/0028.html
>[5]
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Nov/0029.html
>[6]
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Nov/0039.html
>
>[7] http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0811-webcgm/
>[8]
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Nov/0046.html
>[9]
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Nov/0048.html
>
>Logistics
>----------
>Zakim bridge +1 617-761-6200 (US) or +33.4.89.06.34.99 (France)
>code: 932246 ("WEBCGM")
>IRC, channel #webcgm
>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/Overview.html
>
>Regards,
>Lofton

Received on Thursday, 20 November 2008 15:58:17 UTC