- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:22:31 -0700
- To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Hi WebCGM WG -- This is one of a series about the six I18N comments. Although I18N sent a separate message for each of their comments -- which is how we will reply to I18N -- all comments are conveniently found in a single table [1]. All comments apply to 9.3.2.2, the ACI mapList element [2] [1] http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0811-webcgm/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-webcgm21-20080917/WebCGM21-Config.html#ACI-maplist In this message, I have proposed responses. Email discussion welcome. We will resolve definitively in a WG teleconference. I18N labels Comments #1 and #2 as Editorial: Comment #1: ===== In 9.3.2.2, "CDATA" should be bold. Proposed response: agreed, in fact the whole string 'substitutionList="CDATA" ' should be bold. Comment #2: ===== "It is unclear where these rules are in CSS2, ie. whether there are more than in the font-family section, given the use of the phrase 'in particular'. If so, we couldn't find where." Proposed response: Change: "The list syntax and normalization are derived from the specifications of CSS 2.0 [@@CSS20@@]. In particular, the values and syntax of the substitutionList attribute are derived from CSS's definition of the @@font-family@@ property:" to: "The values and syntax of the substitutionList attribute, as well as the normalization of that attribute, are derived from the definition of the @@font-family@@ property in CSS2 2.0 [@@CSS20@@]:" [LH-note: @@font-family@@ links to: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/fonts.html#font-family-prop ] Regards, -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2008 18:23:23 UTC