- From: Weidenbrueck, Dieter <dweidenbrueck@ptc.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:11:56 -0400
- To: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Approved -----Original Message----- From: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lofton Henderson Sent: Donnerstag, 30. August 2007 23:38 To: WebCGM WG Subject: attention -- WG approval of 1.0 strategy For the four of you who were not at today's telecon, we need your approval of the 1.0 errata processing strategy that the four attendees tentatively approved. Long story short, we believe that publication of a reviewed Errata document will suffice, and that publication of a 1.0 Third Release is neither necessary nor desirable -- in fact it might be painful to align that six-year-old document with current pubrules. Details... Today's minutes: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Minutes/2007/08/30-webcgm-minutes.h tml Please search for the string "publish a new" and start reading at that line. It details our rationale, and also presents the case that the decision is acceptable under W3C Process and the WebCGM WG Charter. Question (for today's absentees): do you agree? Please reply to this message, Cc: to the WebCGM WG list. Regards, -Lofton.
Received on Friday, 31 August 2007 06:12:07 UTC