Re: attention -- WG approval of 1.0 strategy

Lofton,


I agree to publish an Errata  document which will suffice, and that 
publication of a 1.0 Third Release is not necessary in our case.

As our errata document incorporates class 3 errata, we will follow section
"7.6.4 Call for Review of Proposed Corrections"
of
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#correction-classes

Therefore we will have a four weeks public "Call for Review".

Thierry.



  Henderson wrote:
> 
> For the four of you who were not at today's telecon, we need your 
> approval of the 1.0 errata processing strategy that the four attendees 
> tentatively approved.
> 
> Long story short, we believe that publication of a reviewed Errata 
> document will suffice, and that publication of a 1.0 Third Release is 
> neither necessary nor desirable -- in fact it might be painful to align 
> that six-year-old document with current pubrules.  Details...
> 
> Today's minutes:
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Minutes/2007/08/30-webcgm-minutes.html
> 
> Please search for the string "publish a new" and start reading at that 
> line.  It details our rationale, and also presents the case that the 
> decision is acceptable under W3C Process and the WebCGM WG Charter.
> 
> Question (for today's absentees):  do you agree?
> 
> Please reply to this message, Cc: to the WebCGM WG list.
> 
> Regards,
> -Lofton.
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 31 August 2007 06:09:01 UTC