Re: process and milestones for moving WebCGM 2.0 to LC.

Lofton Henderson wrote:
> 
> At 11:04 AM 6/6/2006 +0200, Thierry MICHEL wrote:
> 
>> Lofton Henderson wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Questions.  You said earlier that the letter to the Chairs & 
>>> dependencies need not reference a minutes with resolution to advance 
>>> to Last Call.  So I can be send it now, e.g., Monday or Tuesday?  
>>> That is, we don't need to discuss / approve it during a WG 
>>> teleconference, correct?  (Although I'm happy to have any feedback 
>>> that any WG-ers might have.)
>>
>> Yes there is no request to reference a minutes with resolution to 
>> advance to LC for this email.
> 
> Then I propose that I'll send it today, unless anyone thinks that I 
> should wait.  Going once, going twice, ...?

OK

> 
>> It is mandatory in the *Transition Request*.
> 
> And I'll propose that I send that on Thursday after WG telecon.  (And 
> pending answers to questions that I just asked about it in previous 
> message to you.)

OK
> 
> -Lofton.
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Thierry Michel
W3C

Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2006 16:45:38 UTC