RE: FW: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3

Thierry,
 
Let me confirm...

Are  you saying that I can use
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/Group/2006/REC-webcgm20-20070115/ in
S1000D 2.3 and the ATA iSpec 2200 with some certainty??  I'm getting
pressure to get the link into the text.  Keeping in mind that the actual
specs won't be published until end of February in the case of S1000D and
later for iSpec 2200.

Thx....Dave


Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange
Boeing Commercial Airplane
206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734
david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Thierry Michel [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 10:03 AM
To: Cruikshank, David W
Cc: lofton@rockynet.com; WebCGM WG
Subject: Re: FW: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3


I had installed a draft version of of REC here
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/Group/2006/REC-webcgm20-20070115/

The changes I have done in the version only apply to the cover page.
Lofton needs to adds some update I believe (appendix D1, etc.).

The stable URL of the final Spec, I do not know it, it will be based on
the date of publication.

  If you need to introduce something into the sopec -  S1000D Issue 2.3
, you should do it at the above URL and keep Lofton informed of you
edits to track these in our "changes appendix".

Thx,
Thierry.




Cruikshank, David W wrote:
>  
> Any chance we would know the stable url of WebCGM 2.0 prior to actual 
> publishing?  We are in a position where we need to insert something 
> into S1000D Issue 2.3.
> 
> Thx....Dave Cruikshank
> 
> Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange Boeing Commercial

> Airplane 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zimmermann, Peter E. [mailto:Peter.E.Zimmermann@eads.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 6:19 AM
> To: Cruikshank, David W
> Subject: RE: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3
> 
> Dave,
> 
> Is there a chance to push at least the W3C guys a bit?
> 
> Regards,
> Peter. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cruikshank, David W [mailto:david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 7:37 PM
> To: Zimmermann, Peter E.
> Subject: RE: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3
> 
> Thanks Peter,
> 
> WebCGM 2.0 as cleared the PR stage in W3C.  I think right after the 
> 1st of the year it will be published as REC.
> 
> The OASIS balloting for WebCGM OS runs from Dec 16th through the end 
> of Dec.
> 
> Thx...Dave
> 
> 
> Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange Boeing Commercial

> Airplane 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zimmermann, Peter E. [mailto:Peter.E.Zimmermann@eads.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:46 AM
> To: Cruikshank, David W
> Subject: RE: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3
> 
> Thanks Dave.
> 
> I will update Chap 7.3.2 in accordance with your comments.
> When do you think WebCGM 2.0 will become a W3C REC?
> 
> Outstanding also (I believe): Valid S1000D XML Schema for companion 
> files.
> Will you provide a final valid version to Nico and me? When?
> 
> Regards,
> Peter. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cruikshank, David W [mailto:david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 11:34 PM
> To: Zimmermann, Peter E.
> Subject: RE: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3
> 
> Peter,
> 
> Denis has good points here...I'll address them her and then go into 
> the forum site and proposd editing for the chapter.
> 
> 1) is the use of the XCF a project decision or mandatory?
> 
> 	I think it's a project decision
>  
> 2) are the mapping rules (eg Table 5, XCF mapping of element 
> <hotspot>) project decisions (each rule) or mandatory?
> 
> 	Project decision
> 
> 3) Be careful,
> <!ATTLIST webcgm
>    ...
>    pictureVisibility (on | off) "on" #IMPLIED
>    ...
>  >
> is not valid (several occurrences of such constructions) XML DTD 
> construct
> 
> 	Agreed, this is something that you and I edited into the chapter

> without really thinking about it.  The WebCGM 2.0 spec has the correct

> initial values and behaviors for all of these defined.  They shouldn't

> be here, nor in the XCF DTD.
> 
> 4) Please also check that 2 attributes of type ID on the same element 
> is allowed by XML or by the Schemas (if i remember correctly it is not

> valid in pure SGML).
> 
> 	Agreed.  The S1000D:id should be CDATA.
> 
> Thx....Dave Cruikshank
> 
> Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange Boeing Commercial

> Airplane 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zimmermann, Peter E. [mailto:Peter.E.Zimmermann@eads.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 2:51 PM
> To: Cruikshank, David W
> Subject: WG: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3
> 
> Dave, would you please give us some answers. Thanks, Peter. 
> Regards,
> Peter Zimmermann
> Expert ILS Process Standards
> 
> EADS
> Military Air Systems
> Technical Publications - PSCG2
> 81663 Munich - Germany
> Phone: +49 (0) 89.6 07-2 17 38
> Fax: +49 (0) 89.607-2 18 75
> Mobile: +49 (0) 151.16 86 35 14
> E-mail: Peter.E.Zimmermann@eads.com
> 
> NOTICE: This message, together with any attachments, may contain 
> privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received this 
> e-mail in error or are not an intended recipient, you may not use, 
> reproduce, disseminate or distribute it; do not open nor save any 
> attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the 
> sender promptly by e-mail that you have done so. Thank you.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Excoffier, Denis
> To: Zimmermann, Peter E.
> CC: Excoffier, Denis; Deschamp, Bernard
> Sent: Wed Dec 06 18:04:19 2006
> Subject: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I had a look into your chapter 7.3.2 Issue 003 Inwork 53 and now, a 
> few
> questions/remarks:
> 
> 
> 1) is the use of the XCF a project decision or mandatory?
> 
> 2) are the mapping rules (eg Table 5, XCF mapping of element 
> <hotspot>) project decisions (each rule) or mandatory?
> 
> 3) Be careful,
> <!ATTLIST webcgm
>    ...
>    pictureVisibility (on | off) "on" #IMPLIED
>    ...
>  >
> is not valid (several occurrences of such constructions) XML DTD 
> construct
> 
> 4) Please also check that 2 attributes of type ID on the same element 
> is allowed by XML or by the Schemas (if i remember correctly it is not

> valid in pure SGML).
> 
> Regards.
> 
> Denis Excoffier.

Received on Friday, 22 December 2006 15:18:36 UTC