Saturday, 30 January 2021
Friday, 29 January 2021
Thursday, 28 January 2021
- [webauthn] Note to encourage storage of registered credential details (#1556)
- [webauthn] Move step 16 of Registration to between 21 and 22 (#1555)
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
Wednesday, 27 January 2021
- Closed: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- Re: [webauthn] Adding info about HSTS for the RPID to client Data. (#1554)
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Draft changes for allowCredentials to indicate per-credential verification
- Re: [webauthn] Draft changes for allowCredentials to indicate per-credential verification (#1547)
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- Re: [webauthn] Draft changes for allowCredentials to indicate per-credential verification (#1547)
- [webauthn] Adding info about HSTS for the RPID to client Data. (#1554)
- 1/27/2021 W3C Web Authentication WG Meetings
Tuesday, 26 January 2021
Monday, 25 January 2021
- [w3c/webauthn] dc9c31: move Rolf to fomer editors
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: [webauthn] editorial cleanups noted by Mr Pinkas (#1549)
Saturday, 23 January 2021
Friday, 22 January 2021
Thursday, 21 January 2021
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- Re: [webauthn] fix: empty section, misspelling, RFC7049 is now RFC8949 (#1550)
- [w3c/webauthn] a0a655: Built by Travis-CI: e6791c053bcb7f205713d05a530415...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] e6791c: fix: empty section, misspelling, RFC7049 is now RF...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by sideshowbarker
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: fix: empty section, misspelling, RFC7049 is now RFC8949
- Closed: [webauthn] editorial cleanups noted by Mr Pinkas (#1549)
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: update bikeshed cache
- Re: [webauthn] update bikeshed cache (#1551)
- [w3c/webauthn] 1ff470: Built by Travis-CI: a1f2e95f3d8b57f57a38c01881380e...
- [w3c/webauthn] 0fff9b: fix: empty section, misspelling, RFC7049 is now RF...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by sideshowbarker
- [w3c/webauthn] a1f2e9: Bikeshed spec data update (#1553)
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Bikeshed spec data update
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by sideshowbarker
- [w3c/webauthn] e48b3e: Bikeshed spec data update
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by sideshowbarker
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Bikeshed spec data update
- [w3c/webauthn] b16d31: Bikeshed spec data update
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by wseltzer
- Re: [webauthn] Bikeshed .spec-data update (#1552)
- [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Bikeshed .spec-data update
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Bikeshed .spec-data update
- Re: [webauthn] update bikeshed cache (#1551)
- [w3c/webauthn] bd4deb: Bikeshed .spec-data update
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by wseltzer
- Re: [webauthn] update bikeshed cache (#1551)
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: update bikeshed cache
- [w3c/webauthn] 683755: update bikeshed cache
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
Wednesday, 20 January 2021
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: fix: empty section, misspelling, RFC7049 is now RFC8949
- [w3c/webauthn] 3b7655: fix: empty section, misspelling, RFC7049 is now RF...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: [webauthn] editorial cleanups noted by Mr Pinkas (#1549)
- Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510)
- [webauthn] editorial cleanups noted by Mr Pinkas (#1549)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Update editors and past editors
- [w3c/webauthn] c47f9d: Update editors and past editors
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- 01/20/2021 W3C Web Authentication WG Meetings
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Draft changes for allowCredentials to indicate per-credential verification
Tuesday, 19 January 2021
Friday, 15 January 2021
- Re: [webauthn] Support for authenticators providing two keys (#1546)
- Re: [webauthn] Support for authenticators providing two keys (#1546)
- Re: PSA: Meet Face ID and Touch ID for the Web
- Re: [webauthn] Support for authenticators providing two keys (#1546)
Thursday, 14 January 2021
- [webauthn] Support for authenticators providing two keys (#1546)
- PSA: Meet Face ID and Touch ID for the Web
Wednesday, 13 January 2021
Tuesday, 12 January 2021
Monday, 11 January 2021
Sunday, 10 January 2021
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151)
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151)
Thursday, 7 January 2021
- Re: [webauthn] Add support for non-modal UI (#1545)
- Re: [webauthn] Add support for non-modal UI (#1545)
- Re: [webauthn] Add support for non-modal UI (#1545)
- Re: [webauthn] Add support for non-modal UI (#1545)
- Re: [webauthn] Add support for non-modal UI (#1545)
Wednesday, 6 January 2021
- [webauthn] Add support for non-modal UI (#1545)
- Re: [webauthn] Standardising support for software authenticators (#1175)
- Closed: [webauthn] Standardising support for software authenticators (#1175)
- Re: [webauthn] Making PublicKeyCredentialDescriptor.transports mandatory (#1522)
- Re: [webauthn] Consider allowing cross-domain credential use (#1372)
- Re: [webauthn] Addition of a network transport (#1381)
- Closed: [webauthn] Question about platform authenticator (#1540)
- Re: [webauthn] Question about platform authenticator (#1540)