W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > June 2020

Re: [webauthn] "signature formats" section is underspecified (#1441)

From: Mike Jones via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:55:33 +0000
To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-649004615-1593024932-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The Signature Formats section https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#sctn-signature-attestation-types already lists specific encodings for ES256, RS256, and PS256.  We should add specific guidance for other supported formats, including EdDSA, ES256K, etc.  What algorithms am I missing?  We should leave the non-normative guidance for algorithms still TBD, but I don't think we should create normative requirements for signature formats that don't exist yet.

I believe that @ve7jtb has a related PR to add some of this already.  Can someone add a link to that in this issue?

GitHub Notification of comment by selfissued
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1441#issuecomment-649004615 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2020 18:55:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:41 UTC