- From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:58:30 +0100
- To: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-qa-wg@w3.org>, <tag@w3.org>, "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, <public-webarch-comments@w3.org>
Lofton, Karl, Thanks for responding... The TAG have a F2F meeting scheduled for 5-7th October in Europe. I expect this to focus on the LC comments we receive on our LC#2 draft of webarch. If you are able to send comments by the end of our last call (17th September IIRC) we could maybe schedule a meeting between then and our F2F - say Monday 20th or 27th Sept. Would either of those dates work for QA-WG? Best regards Stuart -- > -----Original Message----- > From: public-webarch-comments-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-webarch-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > Lofton Henderson > Sent: 25 August 2004 14:44 > To: Williams, Stuart > Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org; tag@w3.org; David Orchard; > public-webarch-comments@w3.org > Subject: RE: WebArch comment from QA WG > > > Stuart, > > Thanks for the reply and the suggestion to confer. > > Two quick comments: > > 1.) IMO, the suggested conference is a good idea (however, as > I'm no longer QA co-chair, Karl is probably the one to schedule this); > > 2.) right now, we're in the middle of publication (8/30) for Spec. > Guidelines (which contains our extensibility stuff) and QA > Handbook, and we also have an action to generate WebArch Last > Call comments in a couple weeks. To me, it would seem timely > to talk after we have finished both of these, as they will > likely have led us (QAWG) to a close comparison of new SpecGL > stuff and LC WebArch. > > Regards, > -Lofton.
Received on Friday, 3 September 2004 12:59:06 UTC