- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:04:50 -0500
- To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Cc: public-webarch-comments@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 20:03:51 UTC
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 14:45, Larry Masinter wrote: > > Is a review in the next 2 months sufficiently soon? > > It would be useful to review these before webarch is completed, > so as to resolve inconsistencies between the "ownership" model > in the webarch document and the operational view that a URI scheme > defines meaning, rather than the "owner". Hmm... I'm reluctant to add dependencies at this point, but I can see your point. Hmm... Thanks for the pointers. [...] > http://home.att.net/~tony-hansen/ietf/draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guide > lines-00.txt > http://home.att.net/~tony-hansen/ietf/draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guide > lines-00.html > http://home.att.net/~tony-hansen/ietf/draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guide > lines-00.xml -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 20:03:51 UTC