Re: CfC to adopt "Post-Spectre Web Development" as a Note-track document

Wonderful, thanks Dan! I've initiated that transfer, +Wendy Seltzer
<wseltzer@w3.org>.

-mike


On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 7:07 PM Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Yup, sounds good. The next step would be you and Wendy doing the
> repo-handoff, right?
> -Dan Veditz
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:06 AM Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Great, thanks for that confirmation, John!
>>
>> Dan, given the feedback thus far, I wonder if it's worth moving the
>> document to the W3C repository, and kicking off the process of publishing
>> an FPWD now, and continuing the conversation about concrete next steps on
>> the call next week? Do you think there's enough consensus for that step?
>>
>> -mike
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 5:21 PM John Wilander <wilander@apple.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 8, 2021, at 2:03 PM, Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 11:02 AM John Wilander <wilander@apple.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We’d like a little more time to review this. The link to Mike’s doc is
>>>> broken.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Note that we are not currently agreeing to specific content of the
>>> current document. The CfC is whether making a recommendation along these
>>> lines, with this as a foundation to build on, is within our scope and
>>> useful to the web developer community. If we agree it is, I'm sure we'll
>>> argue over the specific recommendations later.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sure. We wanted to see Mike's doc and discuss the merit of working on a
>>> non-normative document in this group. Now we have done that and the effort
>>> seems useful.
>>>
>>>    Regards, John
>>>
>>

Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2021 18:30:21 UTC