Yup, sounds good. The next step would be you and Wendy doing the repo-handoff, right? -Dan Veditz On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:06 AM Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > Great, thanks for that confirmation, John! > > Dan, given the feedback thus far, I wonder if it's worth moving the > document to the W3C repository, and kicking off the process of publishing > an FPWD now, and continuing the conversation about concrete next steps on > the call next week? Do you think there's enough consensus for that step? > > -mike > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 5:21 PM John Wilander <wilander@apple.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 8, 2021, at 2:03 PM, Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 11:02 AM John Wilander <wilander@apple.com> wrote: >> >>> We’d like a little more time to review this. The link to Mike’s doc is >>> broken. >>> >> >> Note that we are not currently agreeing to specific content of the >> current document. The CfC is whether making a recommendation along these >> lines, with this as a foundation to build on, is within our scope and >> useful to the web developer community. If we agree it is, I'm sure we'll >> argue over the specific recommendations later. >> >> >> Sure. We wanted to see Mike's doc and discuss the merit of working on a >> non-normative document in this group. Now we have done that and the effort >> seems useful. >> >> Regards, John >> >
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2021 18:07:24 UTC