- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 17:00:16 +0000
- To: public-webappsec@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1j3jkm-0005tv-79@uranus.w3.org>
Issues
------
* w3c/webappsec (+0/-0/💬1)
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #543 Prevent programmatic focus in iframe (1 by uhrohraggy)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/issues/543
* w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity (+1/-0/💬0)
1 issues created:
- SubResourceIntegrity check failed for <link> tag (by manoj6587)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity/issues/91
* w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts (+1/-4/💬10)
1 issues created:
- Convoluted blob: URL issue (by annevk)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/71
5 issues received 10 new comments:
- #69 Can data: URLs be part of a secure context? (5 by annevk, mikewest)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/69
- #59 Typo: "Intergration with WebIDL" (1 by annevk)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/59
- #28 Consider whether sandboxed content should automatically be a secure context (2 by annevk, mikewest)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/28
- #26 Sandboxed data: URI in a localhost page should be a Secure Context (1 by annevk)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/26
- #9 Figure out how to manage normative dependencies to WHATWG HTML for features not in W3C HTML for CR/REC (1 by annevk)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/9 [help wanted]
4 issues closed:
- Consider whether sandboxed content should automatically be a secure context https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/28
- Figure out how to manage normative dependencies to WHATWG HTML for features not in W3C HTML for CR/REC https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/9 [help wanted]
- Typo: "Intergration with WebIDL" https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/59
- Can data: URLs be part of a secure context? https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/69
* w3c/webappsec-feature-policy (+0/-0/💬2)
1 issues received 2 new comments:
- #189 Proposal: define default for all (2 by Valodim, oliverjanik)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-feature-policy/issues/189 [feature question]
* w3c/webappsec-fetch-metadata (+1/-0/💬1)
1 issues created:
- Should we ignore invalid values? (by sspi)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-fetch-metadata/issues/54
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #54 Should we ignore invalid values? (1 by arturjanc)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-fetch-metadata/issues/54
* WICG/trusted-types (+2/-0/💬15)
2 issues created:
- Consider allowing creating a policy via a constructor. (by koto)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/258
- Use of [Unforgeable] in Trusted Types WebIDL (by littledan)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/257
3 issues received 15 new comments:
- #258 Consider allowing creating a policy via a constructor. (2 by koto, otherdaniel)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/258
- #257 Use of [Unforgeable] in Trusted Types WebIDL (12 by annevk, domenic, koto, littledan)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/257
- #248 Alternative Options for Default Policy. (1 by annevk)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/248
Pull requests
-------------
* w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity (+0/-0/💬1)
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #86 Apply integrity checks to inline script and style blocks. (1 by mozdevcontrib)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity/pull/86
* w3c/webappsec-referrer-policy (+0/-0/💬1)
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #126 Strip referrer information from non-secure requests. (1 by fmarier)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-referrer-policy/pull/126
* w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts (+3/-3/💬2)
3 pull requests submitted:
- Drop the sandbox flag. (by mikewest)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/73
- data: URLs (by annevk)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/72
- Meta: address Bikeshed issues (by annevk)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/70
2 pull requests received 2 new comments:
- #73 Drop the sandbox flag. (1 by mikewest)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/73
- #70 Meta: address Bikeshed issues (1 by annevk)
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/70
3 pull requests merged:
- Drop the sandbox flag.
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/73
- Fix typo in WebIDL header
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/67
- data: URLs
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/72
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-csp
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-mixed-content
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-upgrade-insecure-requests
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-credential-management
* https://github.com/w3c/permissions
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-referrer-policy
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-clear-site-data
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-cowl
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-epr
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-suborigins
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-cspee
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-feature-policy
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-fetch-metadata
* https://github.com/WICG/trusted-types
* https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-unofficial-drafts
Received on Monday, 17 February 2020 17:00:18 UTC