- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 17:00:16 +0000
- To: public-webappsec@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1j3jkm-0005tv-79@uranus.w3.org>
Issues ------ * w3c/webappsec (+0/-0/💬1) 1 issues received 1 new comments: - #543 Prevent programmatic focus in iframe (1 by uhrohraggy) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/issues/543 * w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity (+1/-0/💬0) 1 issues created: - SubResourceIntegrity check failed for <link> tag (by manoj6587) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity/issues/91 * w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts (+1/-4/💬10) 1 issues created: - Convoluted blob: URL issue (by annevk) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/71 5 issues received 10 new comments: - #69 Can data: URLs be part of a secure context? (5 by annevk, mikewest) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/69 - #59 Typo: "Intergration with WebIDL" (1 by annevk) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/59 - #28 Consider whether sandboxed content should automatically be a secure context (2 by annevk, mikewest) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/28 - #26 Sandboxed data: URI in a localhost page should be a Secure Context (1 by annevk) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/26 - #9 Figure out how to manage normative dependencies to WHATWG HTML for features not in W3C HTML for CR/REC (1 by annevk) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/9 [help wanted] 4 issues closed: - Consider whether sandboxed content should automatically be a secure context https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/28 - Figure out how to manage normative dependencies to WHATWG HTML for features not in W3C HTML for CR/REC https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/9 [help wanted] - Typo: "Intergration with WebIDL" https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/59 - Can data: URLs be part of a secure context? https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/69 * w3c/webappsec-feature-policy (+0/-0/💬2) 1 issues received 2 new comments: - #189 Proposal: define default for all (2 by Valodim, oliverjanik) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-feature-policy/issues/189 [feature question] * w3c/webappsec-fetch-metadata (+1/-0/💬1) 1 issues created: - Should we ignore invalid values? (by sspi) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-fetch-metadata/issues/54 1 issues received 1 new comments: - #54 Should we ignore invalid values? (1 by arturjanc) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-fetch-metadata/issues/54 * WICG/trusted-types (+2/-0/💬15) 2 issues created: - Consider allowing creating a policy via a constructor. (by koto) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/258 - Use of [Unforgeable] in Trusted Types WebIDL (by littledan) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/257 3 issues received 15 new comments: - #258 Consider allowing creating a policy via a constructor. (2 by koto, otherdaniel) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/258 - #257 Use of [Unforgeable] in Trusted Types WebIDL (12 by annevk, domenic, koto, littledan) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/257 - #248 Alternative Options for Default Policy. (1 by annevk) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/248 Pull requests ------------- * w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity (+0/-0/💬1) 1 pull requests received 1 new comments: - #86 Apply integrity checks to inline script and style blocks. (1 by mozdevcontrib) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity/pull/86 * w3c/webappsec-referrer-policy (+0/-0/💬1) 1 pull requests received 1 new comments: - #126 Strip referrer information from non-secure requests. (1 by fmarier) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-referrer-policy/pull/126 * w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts (+3/-3/💬2) 3 pull requests submitted: - Drop the sandbox flag. (by mikewest) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/73 - data: URLs (by annevk) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/72 - Meta: address Bikeshed issues (by annevk) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/70 2 pull requests received 2 new comments: - #73 Drop the sandbox flag. (1 by mikewest) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/73 - #70 Meta: address Bikeshed issues (1 by annevk) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/70 3 pull requests merged: - Drop the sandbox flag. https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/73 - Fix typo in WebIDL header https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/67 - data: URLs https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/72 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-csp * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-mixed-content * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-upgrade-insecure-requests * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-credential-management * https://github.com/w3c/permissions * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-referrer-policy * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-clear-site-data * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-cowl * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-epr * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-suborigins * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-cspee * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-feature-policy * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-fetch-metadata * https://github.com/WICG/trusted-types * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-unofficial-drafts
Received on Monday, 17 February 2020 17:00:18 UTC