Re: CfC to adopt Feature Policy (deadline Nov. 7th)

Thanks to you both, and to the more silent members of the majority. :) It
looks like we have confirmation of our consensus to adopt the document into
this group's set of deliverables.

+Ian Clelland <>, would you mind sending an Intent to
Migrate <> to the WICG,
and generating an FPWD version of the document so we can follow this up
with a CfC for publication?


On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:00 AM Giorgio Maone <> wrote:

> On 06/11/18 21:03, Oda, Terri wrote:
> I'll add my voice to the silent support chorus (since I know it's
> sometimes nice to have an indicator that someone actually read the email
> and associated documents): this does indeed look like it fits the charter
> and I approve of the adoption.
> +1
> -- G
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 1:29 AM Mike West <> wrote:
>> Hey folks!
>> As discussed at TPAC
>> <>, there's
>> interest in migrating Feature Policy
>> <> out of the WICG, and into
>> WebAppSec. There were no objections at the time, with general agreement
>> that it fit into our existing charter's scope
>> <> pretty cleanly.
>> I'd like to make sure the rest of the group feels similarly.
>> This, therefore, is a call for consensus regarding Feature Policy's
>> adoption into this working group. If you have any concerns with this
>> adoption, please respond here by November 7th. Silence will be interpreted
>> as support. :)
>> If we generally agree to adopt the deliverable, the next steps will be to
>> send an Intent to Migrate
>> <> to the WICG, and
>> to move into another CfC to publish the incubated document as a FPWD. Ah,
>> process...
>> Thanks!
>> -mike

Received on Friday, 9 November 2018 10:45:11 UTC