On 06/11/18 21:03, Oda, Terri wrote: > I'll add my voice to the silent support chorus (since I know it's > sometimes nice to have an indicator that someone actually read the > email and associated documents): this does indeed look like it fits > the charter and I approve of the adoption. +1 -- G > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 1:29 AM Mike West <mkwst@google.com > <mailto:mkwst@google.com>> wrote: > > Hey folks! > > As discussed at TPAC > <https://www.w3.org/2018/10/23-webappsec-minutes.html#item08>, > there's interest in migrating Feature Policy > <https://wicg.github.io/feature-policy/> out of the WICG, and into > WebAppSec. There were no objections at the time, with general > agreement that it fit into our existing charter's scope > <https://www.w3.org/2011/webappsec/charter-2017.html> pretty > cleanly. I'd like to make sure the rest of the group feels similarly. > > This, therefore, is a call for consensus regarding Feature > Policy's adoption into this working group. If you have any > concerns with this adoption, please respond here by November 7th. > Silence will be interpreted as support. :) > > If we generally agree to adopt the deliverable, the next steps > will be to send an Intent to Migrate > <https://wicg.github.io/admin/intent-to-migrate.html> to the WICG, > and to move into another CfC to publish the incubated document as > a FPWD. Ah, process... > > Thanks! > > -mike >Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2018 00:00:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:55:05 UTC