On 06/11/18 21:03, Oda, Terri wrote:
> I'll add my voice to the silent support chorus (since I know it's
> sometimes nice to have an indicator that someone actually read the
> email and associated documents): this does indeed look like it fits
> the charter and I approve of the adoption.
+1
-- G
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 1:29 AM Mike West <mkwst@google.com
> <mailto:mkwst@google.com>> wrote:
>
> Hey folks!
>
> As discussed at TPAC
> <https://www.w3.org/2018/10/23-webappsec-minutes.html#item08>,
> there's interest in migrating Feature Policy
> <https://wicg.github.io/feature-policy/> out of the WICG, and into
> WebAppSec. There were no objections at the time, with general
> agreement that it fit into our existing charter's scope
> <https://www.w3.org/2011/webappsec/charter-2017.html> pretty
> cleanly. I'd like to make sure the rest of the group feels similarly.
>
> This, therefore, is a call for consensus regarding Feature
> Policy's adoption into this working group. If you have any
> concerns with this adoption, please respond here by November 7th.
> Silence will be interpreted as support. :)
>
> If we generally agree to adopt the deliverable, the next steps
> will be to send an Intent to Migrate
> <https://wicg.github.io/admin/intent-to-migrate.html> to the WICG,
> and to move into another CfC to publish the incubated document as
> a FPWD. Ah, process...
>
> Thanks!
>
> -mike
>