Re: Call for Consensus: Stop work and transition 3 Working Drafts to Working Group Notes

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:42 PM, David Ross <drx@google.com> wrote:
> In any case, EPR has been stalled for other reasons and I'm not going to
> contest the proposed transition.  I just hope that it won't be too hard to
> revive it as necessary in the future.

Can you elaborate on the other reasons? Although I'm still a little
concerned about the features EPR offers, having isolation against XSS
and XSRF does seem like a necessary component to offer more low-level
APIs to the web.


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Monday, 18 July 2016 07:31:00 UTC