- From: John Wong <gokoproject@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:47:01 -0400
- To: Jonathan Kingston <jonathan@jooped.com>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2015 15:47:29 UTC
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Jonathan Kingston <jonathan@jooped.com> wrote: > > The credential manager would also have the ability to inform users of > applications using weak credentials for longer time periods than suggested. > > > --- > > This might for example look like: > > navigator.credentials.get({ "password": true, credentialClass: 2 }) > > A application would inform the credential manager what class of credential > they require, this prevents the credential manager sending things that the > app can't cope with however also prevents the site making bad choices. > > This is where confuses me, and excuse if it is clear to others. How should CM prevent the site from making bad choices? I think the first part is like handshake where we exchange, negotiate and agree upon something. But maybe we have to be careful with negotiation - if WG says these are the only classes UA supports. At least there should be an option in the browser to bypass the negotiation so it makes testing easy (maybe I want to test weak password). John
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2015 15:47:29 UTC