Re: Split the `w3c/webappsec` respository?

Granular access rights seems like the only immediate win here.

Would published specifications still just go to a centralised repo or would
the main repo just link to the individual specification repos?

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 3:01 PM Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org> wrote:

> On 09/10/2015 09:53 AM, Mike West wrote:
> > It sounds like most folks are in favor of splitting.
> >
> > I'll slap together a strawman of what a split might look like, and then
> we
> > can argue about it a bit more before we ask Wendy to do a lot of work on
> > our behalf (hi, Wendy :) ).
>
> Thanks Mike, I'm at your disposal once the group has figured out how
> things should work :)
>
> --Wendy
>
> >
> > -mike
> >
> > --
> > Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, @mikewest
> >
> > Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München,
> > Germany, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der
> > Gesellschaft: Hamburg, Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth
> > Flores
> > (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails.
> Bleh.)
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> submodules make my mind melt.  so many incantations to make them work
> >> correctly.  please no, I am just not smart enough to deal.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:43 PM Ángel González <angel@16bits.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> There could be split repositories with each on them included as
> >>> submodules of w3c/webappsec. IMHO that should please people wanting it
> >>> in both ways.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
>
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office)
> Policy Counsel and Domain Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
> http://wendy.seltzer.org/        +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)
>
>
>