Re: SRI for preemptive cache validation

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Brian Smith <> wrote:
> Note also that the browser can (should) pre-emptively conditionally request
> the subresources so that the server doesn't have to pre-emptively send 304
> responses for them. If/when browsers do that, that should work out better
> than the server guessing what the client will ask for.

Could you explain more what you mean here?  All the interpretations I
have give me something that's higher latency than pushing 304s.

Received on Thursday, 21 May 2015 11:00:33 UTC