Given that there is some disagreement about this, I don't think we gain anything by asserting that. As I mentioned, I can imagine a UA doing this to encourage migration. On 18 May 2015 at 08:39, Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org> wrote: > On 18/05/15 16:33, Devdatta Akhawe wrote: > > I thought the MAY gave flexibility to UAs. Does it not? > > It does; but I always think that when a spec says "MAY", it means a bit > more than "You MAY consider the moon to be made of green cheese"; i.e. > there are circumstances where the MAY might be a good idea. I'm not sure > I can think of any circumstances where a UA would decide to block loads > due to out-of-date integrity hash algorithms, given that the > no-integrity behaviour is to load regardless. > > Gerv >
Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 19:29:48 UTC