W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > March 2015

Re: CFC to push use new publishing process, was Re: CfC to publish FPWD of Permissions API; ending March 25th

From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:56:33 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKXHy=ejke3NJkxh3JR0Muh3wW9mPZmB55vyCQ1CdCMqp1Boog@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, wseltzer@w3.org, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>, public-webappsec@w3.org, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
I also support using the new process for all our deliverables.
On Mar 25, 2015 5:54 PM, "Brad Hill" <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote:

> I support using the new publication process for all of our deliverables.
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:39 AM Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
>> On 25.03.2015 16:54, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On March 18, 2015 at 5:04:55 PM, Mounir Lamouri (mounir@lamouri.fr)
>> wrote:
>> >> This is a call for consensus to publish the following draft of
>> >> "Permissions API" as a First Public Working Draft:
>> >>
>> >> https://w3c.github.io/permissions/published/2015-03-FPWD.html
>> >>
>> >> The CfC will end in a week (25th of March). If you think that this
>> >> document should not be published, please send comments on
>> >> public-webappsec@w3.org. If you want to discuss the API details,
>> >> replying to this email is welcome but we would greatly appreciate if
>> you
>> >> could open an issue :)
>> >
>> > Given this CFC has now ended successfully, this is a new 1-week CFC to
>> use the new W3C publishing process for the Permissions spec: This would
>> mean that Working Drafts on GitHub will be automatically pushed to /TR/
>> during the Working Draft stage of this specification.
>> >
>> > If you have any concerns, please let us know. Otherwise, silence will
>> be taken as support.
>> >
>> > Many thanks!
>> >
>> > PS: Brad, Daniel, it would be awesome if the was group-wide consensus
>> to use the new publication process. It would save a lot of CFC emails and 1
>> week delays waiting for consensus. This is what we did for WebApps.
>> >
>>
>> I'd love this for Subresource Integrity, where the /TR/ revision is
>> badly out of date (over one year, actually).
>>
>> +1 from me, for group-wide.
>>
>>
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2015 16:57:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:11 UTC