W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > March 2015

Re: CFC to push use new publishing process, was Re: CfC to publish FPWD of Permissions API; ending March 25th

From: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 16:51:36 +0000
Message-ID: <CAEeYn8hccErrMbu+JSha-Vt9=idPeEGZO33QPJQe9rfRQPq5Ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>, public-webappsec@w3.org
Cc: wseltzer@w3.org, Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
I support using the new publication process for all of our deliverables.

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:39 AM Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com> wrote:

> On 25.03.2015 16:54, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> >
> >
> > On March 18, 2015 at 5:04:55 PM, Mounir Lamouri (mounir@lamouri.fr)
> wrote:
> >> This is a call for consensus to publish the following draft of
> >> "Permissions API" as a First Public Working Draft:
> >>
> >> https://w3c.github.io/permissions/published/2015-03-FPWD.html
> >>
> >> The CfC will end in a week (25th of March). If you think that this
> >> document should not be published, please send comments on
> >> public-webappsec@w3.org. If you want to discuss the API details,
> >> replying to this email is welcome but we would greatly appreciate if you
> >> could open an issue :)
> >
> > Given this CFC has now ended successfully, this is a new 1-week CFC to
> use the new W3C publishing process for the Permissions spec: This would
> mean that Working Drafts on GitHub will be automatically pushed to /TR/
> during the Working Draft stage of this specification.
> >
> > If you have any concerns, please let us know. Otherwise, silence will be
> taken as support.
> >
> > Many thanks!
> >
> > PS: Brad, Daniel, it would be awesome if the was group-wide consensus to
> use the new publication process. It would save a lot of CFC emails and 1
> week delays waiting for consensus. This is what we did for WebApps.
> >
>
> I'd love this for Subresource Integrity, where the /TR/ revision is
> badly out of date (over one year, actually).
>
> +1 from me, for group-wide.
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2015 16:52:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:11 UTC