- From: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 15:43:12 -0400
- To: public-webappsec@w3.org, Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
On 06/01/2015 09:59 AM, Manu Sporny wrote: > On 06/01/2015 08:35 AM, Mike West wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Manu Sporny >> <msporny@digitalbazaar.com <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> >> wrote: >> >> the WebIDL would only need to go through a few changes to support our >> extension only to find out that our extension isn't the sort of >> extension that the CM API was designed for. >> >> Could you clarify what changes you'd like to see in this document's >> WebIDL? >> >> I read https://docs.google.com/document/d/... >> >> as sketching an extension to the API within the confines of the >> extension points we've built in together, targeting a fleshed-out >> implementation in a document you'd produce in a to-be-chartered WG. >> Is that not the case? Which pieces were intended to change the >> underlying API? > > Mike, your read is more or less on point. > > If you look at the end of the document, we raise a number of discussion > points: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tI0CJ4wAKKPQacrxOmTtl_GQUBeVtbg8e1ZSXs2SWag/edit?pli=1#bookmark=id.e8kdxly5xi0j I realize everyone's quite busy -- I just wanted to make sure no one is waiting on us (Credentials CG members) to provide more information on our proposal. We're in a holding pattern until we receive some responses from Mike or anyone else regarding the discussion points that Manu linked to above [1]. 1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tI0CJ4wAKKPQacrxOmTtl_GQUBeVtbg8e1ZSXs2SWag/edit?pli=1#bookmark=id.e8kdxly5xi0j -- Dave Longley CTO Digital Bazaar, Inc. http://digitalbazaar.com
Received on Monday, 8 June 2015 19:43:35 UTC