I think this is the semantic we need for MIX. If you implement it in Fetch, brilliant. If not, I think I'll need to implement it in MIX, which is less brilliant, but fine. -mike On Jul 30, 2015 12:41, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > > Still, examining the `window` and `client` property sees like a strange > way > > of asking "Is this a passthrough request?" One way of dealing with that > > indirection is to bake it into Fetch. Another is to rewrite the > algorithm in > > MIX to make more sense. It sounds like you'd prefer the latter, Anne. > > I'm not sure, I haven't made up my mind. Indicating "passthrough" in > some way might have value elsewhere too, though I can't immediately > think of anything. It is a bit weird how this works out for MIX, but > copying context over for three values where that has use seems wrong > too. And we definitely need to keep client/window around for a whole > bunch of things. > > > -- > https://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Thursday, 30 July 2015 11:23:12 UTC