W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > July 2015

Re: CfC: Republish MIX as CR; deadline July 29th.

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:41:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78i0E7ZM1=dO6z1k_zqqP3JToRytry69k=ZoszmbbjQxLQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Cc: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Dan Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
> Still, examining the `window` and `client` property sees like a strange way
> of asking "Is this a passthrough request?" One way of dealing with that
> indirection is to bake it into Fetch. Another is to rewrite the algorithm in
> MIX to make more sense. It sounds like you'd prefer the latter, Anne.

I'm not sure, I haven't made up my mind. Indicating "passthrough" in
some way might have value elsewhere too, though I can't immediately
think of anything. It is a bit weird how this works out for MIX, but
copying context over for three values where that has use seems wrong
too. And we definitely need to keep client/window around for a whole
bunch of things.

Received on Thursday, 30 July 2015 10:41:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:50 UTC