- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:12:19 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Francois Marier <francois@mozilla.com>, WebAppSec WG <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > So would mine, for the same reason. Except you lose the coupling in syntax, no? But yeah, that could work too, fair enough. > But is conneg really something > you want to enable for something like this? Not sure: https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Why_not_conneg I suppose it does not matter much, it can always be added later. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2015 18:12:42 UTC