W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > January 2015

Re: [SRI] format of the integrity attribute

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:12:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnb78iCwZkFzhKfdbQZ3TA136F464zcwKD6U1mc5Bm9+zsdMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Francois Marier <francois@mozilla.com>, WebAppSec WG <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Martin Thomson
<martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> So would mine, for the same reason.

Except you lose the coupling in syntax, no? But yeah, that could work
too, fair enough.


> But is conneg really something
> you want to enable for something like this?

Not sure: https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Why_not_conneg I suppose it
does not matter much, it can always be added later.


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2015 18:12:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:09 UTC