Re: [SRI] Getting sha-384 and sha-512 added to the RFC6920 registry?

I have no idea. :) Adding mnot as our resident IETF wonk.

-mike

--
Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, @mikewest

Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München,
Germany, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der
Gesellschaft: Hamburg, Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth
Flores
(Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Francois Marier <francois@mozilla.com>
wrote:

> We use RFC6920 URIs in the SRI spec to encode the hash algorithm and
> value. That RFC created [1] a new registry [2] for the approved hash
> algorithms.
>
> Since we intend to support sha-512 (and potentially sha-384 to match the
> CSP spec [3]), should we get these algorithms added to the registry now?
> Or is the right process to do that after we publish the SRI spec?
>
> Francois
>
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6920#section-9.4
> [2]
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/named-information/named-information.xhtml#hash-alg
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSP2/#source-list-valid-hashes
>
>