- From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:21:26 +0100
- To: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
- Cc: Dan Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org> wrote: > On 02/11/2015 09:07 AM, Mike West wrote: >> Forking this bit too, and dropping people from CC who aren't Brad, >> Wendy, or Dan. >> >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote: >>> There is some of this in the introduction, but I think for FPWD it is >>> important to be very clear about goals for an initial community review - >>> especially since this is new work not explicitly listed in our proposed >>> charter. >> >> From a process perspective, do we need to explicitly list every >> deliverable in the charter? If we come up with something new in the >> future that's covered by the charter's scope >> (https://w3c.github.io/webappsec/admin/webappsec-charter-2015.html#scope), >> do we need to recharter in order to work on it? > > So long as it's in-scope, new work doesn't need to be listed as an > explicit deliverable. Great. Thanks for the clarification. May a thousand tiny specs bloom. ;) -mike -- Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, @mikewest Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg, Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2015 14:22:16 UTC