Re: CfC: Transition CSP2 to CR.

On 09/02/15 21:44, Mike West wrote:
> I agree pretty completely with Brian. If SRI moves away from the `ni:`
> format, and thereby does away with the requirement to support base64uri,
> then let's remove it from both specs. We only added it to CSP to reduce
> impedance between the two specs; if there's no mismatch, then I don't
> think there's any need to complicate the message we send to users.
> Ditto `sha256` vs `sha-256`.

I've prepared a pull request for CSP2:

and have included these changes in my latest proposal for SRI:


Received on Monday, 9 February 2015 21:39:57 UTC