- From: Francois Marier <francois@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:39:25 +1300
- CC: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On 09/02/15 21:44, Mike West wrote: > I agree pretty completely with Brian. If SRI moves away from the `ni:` > format, and thereby does away with the requirement to support base64uri, > then let's remove it from both specs. We only added it to CSP to reduce > impedance between the two specs; if there's no mismatch, then I don't > think there's any need to complicate the message we send to users. > > Ditto `sha256` vs `sha-256`. I've prepared a pull request for CSP2: https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/pull/171 and have included these changes in my latest proposal for SRI: https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/pull/156 Francois
Received on Monday, 9 February 2015 21:39:57 UTC