Re: CfC: Transition CSP2 to CR.

From: Francois Marier <francois@mozilla.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:39:25 +1300 Message-ID: <54D9290D.8010301@mozilla.com> CC: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:10 UTC

On 09/02/15 21:44, Mike West wrote:
> I agree pretty completely with Brian. If SRI moves away from the `ni:`
> format, and thereby does away with the requirement to support base64uri,
> then let's remove it from both specs. We only added it to CSP to reduce
> impedance between the two specs; if there's no mismatch, then I don't
> think there's any need to complicate the message we send to users.
> 
> Ditto `sha256` vs `sha-256`.

I've prepared a pull request for CSP2:

  https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/pull/171

and have included these changes in my latest proposal for SRI:

  https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/pull/156

Francois