Wendy, I like that language, if it is acceptable to Mozilla and others. On Wed Feb 04 2015 at 3:17:23 PM Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org> wrote: > On 02/04/2015 03:40 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > On 2/4/15 1:49 PM, Mike West wrote: > >> CCing Arthur, who I hope can talk a bit about WebApps process, since > >> it seems like a good thing to get on the same page as that group. > > > > WebApps does not have regular calls and when we do have a spec-specific > > call (which are relatively rare), those calls are not used to > > bind/confirm decisions. > > > > (FWIW, I agree WebApps' 10 day waiting period (as defined in the > > charter) is relatively long and that changing it to 7 days would be > > consistent with the length of our binding CfC periods.) > > I wonder, could we address reviewers' concerns without lengthening our > process by modifying that text slightly: > > "Any resolution *first* taken in a face-to-face meeting or > teleconference [i.e., that does not follow a call for consensus on the > mailing list] is to be considered provisional until *5* working days > after the publication of the resolution in draft minutes sent to the > Working Group's mailing list. If no objections are raised on the mailing > list within that time, the resolution will be considered to have > consensus as a resolution of the Working Group." > > > --Wendy > > -- > Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office) > Policy Counsel and Domain Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) > http://wendy.seltzer.org/ +1.617.863.0613 (mobile) > > >
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 23:38:58 UTC