- From: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 18:16:28 -0500
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- CC: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On 02/04/2015 03:40 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 2/4/15 1:49 PM, Mike West wrote: >> CCing Arthur, who I hope can talk a bit about WebApps process, since >> it seems like a good thing to get on the same page as that group. > > WebApps does not have regular calls and when we do have a spec-specific > call (which are relatively rare), those calls are not used to > bind/confirm decisions. > > (FWIW, I agree WebApps' 10 day waiting period (as defined in the > charter) is relatively long and that changing it to 7 days would be > consistent with the length of our binding CfC periods.) I wonder, could we address reviewers' concerns without lengthening our process by modifying that text slightly: "Any resolution *first* taken in a face-to-face meeting or teleconference [i.e., that does not follow a call for consensus on the mailing list] is to be considered provisional until *5* working days after the publication of the resolution in draft minutes sent to the Working Group's mailing list. If no objections are raised on the mailing list within that time, the resolution will be considered to have consensus as a resolution of the Working Group." --Wendy -- Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office) Policy Counsel and Domain Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://wendy.seltzer.org/ +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 23:16:35 UTC