- From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:08:10 +0100
- To: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKXHy=eagbhVvpVxz+y0weiNy8hO7Gt5-hpAYZPwiPvd9T5gxw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org> wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2014/06/webapps-charter.html#decisions > > As explained in the W3C Process Document (section 3.3), this group will > seek to make decisions when there is consensus and with due process. The > expectation is that typically, an editor or other participant makes an > initial proposal, which is then refined in discussion with members of the > group and other reviewers, and consensus emerges with little formal voting > being required. However, if a decision is necessary for timely progress, > but consensus is not achieved after careful consideration of the range of > views presented, the Chairs should put a question out for voting within the > group (allowing for remote asynchronous participation -- using, for > example, email and/or web-based survey techniques) and record a decision, > along with any objections. The matter should then be considered resolved > unless and until new information becomes available. > > > > Any resolution taken in a face-to-face meeting or teleconference is to > be considered provisional until 10 working days after the publication of > the resolution in draft minutes sent to the working groups mailing list. If > no objections are raised on the mailing list within that time, the > resolution will be considered to have consensus as a resolution of the > Working Group. > > > > This charter is written in accordance with Section 3.4, Votes of the W3C > Process Document and includes no voting procedures beyond what the Process > Document requires. > I'm not thrilled with injecting an additional mandatory 10-day delay for decisions... we're slow enough as-is. :) In the past, we've generally _confirmed_ decisions on calls (e.g. CfC issued -> no objections on the list -> confirmed on the next call). Would we need to wait an additional 10 days to act on that decision in that context, or would that not be considered a "resolution taken in a ... teleconference"? Otherwise, LGTM. :) -mike -- Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, @mikewest Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg, Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 16:08:59 UTC