Re: An HTTP->HTTPS upgrading strawman. (was Re: Upgrade mixed content URLs through HTTP header)

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
> I suppose we could change the name from `upgrade-insecure-requests` to
> `upgrade-all-mixed-content`, but that would conceptually preclude using the
> directive on HTTP sites (as the content wouldn't actually be mixed). Perhaps
> that's not a bad thing, but since CSP itself works over HTTP, I don't think
> there's a good reason to deny this particular feature.

Fair. I imagined we would restrict it to secure contexts, but you're
right that there's no clear reason to do so.


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 08:40:08 UTC