On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2015-08-12 07:57, Mike West wrote: > >> Thanks again, Julian! >> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de >> <mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de>> wrote: >> >> ABNF is correct; I'd just use two different ABNF productions for >> parameter for clarity. >> >> >> I don't understand how that would increase clarity. :) >> > > Because somewhere in the prose, you'll be talking about the use of these > grammar elements, right? > In the current prose, there's no distinction between parameters. That is, `Clear-Site-Data: a; b; c` has the same effect as `Clear-Site-Data: a, b; c` and `Clear-Site-Data: a, b, c` and etc. That is, each header has a semicolon-delimited list of key/value pairs, and we grab all of them when determining what to do. At the moment, this is super simple, because everything is just a bare keyword whose presence is the only important thing. If we make things more complicated later, we might need to be more stringent with our processing. -mike
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2015 06:10:28 UTC