Re: [MIX] Normative statements in 4.1 Resource Fetching

I think everything here should follow from the way we define the
interaction with Fetch. You're suggesting just making this a non-normative
section, and explicitly explaining these results as byproducts of the
algorithms?

-mike

--
Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91

Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores
(Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

> It's not a good idea to have duplicate requirements. If the relevant
> requirements follow from Fetch, we should not duplicate them here.
> It's fine to have text explaining the consequences, but we should not
> require it twice.
>
>
> --
> https://annevankesteren.nl/
>
>