W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > November 2014

Re: CfC: Publish a FPWD of "Requirements for Powerful Features"

From: Brad Hill <hillbrad@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:00:55 +0000
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
CC: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D098CE52.1627%hillbrad@fb.com>
I've made a pull request to formalize the tone a bit.  Pending that or
similar updates by the editor, I support the publication of this draft.

-Brad Hill

On 11/24/14, 1:30 AM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

>On 24 Nov 2014, at 8:27 pm, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
>> 
>> This is a call for consensus to publish the following draft of
>>"Requirements for Powerful Features" as a First Public Working Draft:
>> 
>> 
>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://w3c.github.io/webappse

>>c/specs/powerfulfeatures/&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=HU3cThGizwg
>>sko8%2BWBMXZg%3D%3D%0A&m=CW6hMV1syBIKRoKqNZ0%2BGqphbPPvnms0Farw3iO39Y4%3D
>>%0A&s=1c915308057f86867790b8ebceb931e73deff8d3e0a1a3997612a751e2899e84
>> 
>> This document provides guidelines for user agent implementers and spec
>>authors for implementing features whose properties dictate that they
>>only be exposed to the web within a trustworthy environment.
>> 
>> The non-normative, explanatory portions of the document aren't at all
>>complete, but I believe the normative sections are ready for review
>>(note in particular that the normative sections of this new document are
>>lifted with only light modification from the existing Mixed Content
>>LCWD: 
>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://www.w3.org/TR/mixed-con

>>tent/&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=HU3cThGizwgsko8%2BWBMXZg%3D%3D%
>>0A&m=CW6hMV1syBIKRoKqNZ0%2BGqphbPPvnms0Farw3iO39Y4%3D%0A&s=ffa16f81b8a23a
>>b63501aff8b2b52da9a20fde58b53216dee82de24cc5e6e56a).
>> 
>> The TAG has expressed interest in working with us on this document.
>>I'll leave it up to folks like Mark (CC'd) to comment as to whether
>>they'd like to see this structured as a joint deliverable or not.
>
>Thanks, Mike. I'll try to get a cogent answer for you out of the TAG by
>then.
>
>Cheers,
>
>
>--
>Mark Nottingham   
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://www.mnot.net/&k=ZVNjlDM

>F0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=HU3cThGizwgsko8%2BWBMXZg%3D%3D%0A&m=CW6hMV1syBI
>KRoKqNZ0%2BGqphbPPvnms0Farw3iO39Y4%3D%0A&s=5fcd4a9c1cac8c721cbe4065c599de4
>777d5b48766b10a20f8db8bff816e1e62
>
>

Received on Monday, 24 November 2014 20:01:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:08 UTC