W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > November 2014

Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:35:00 +1100
Cc: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Daniel Appelquist <appelquist@gmail.com>, Brad Hill <hillbrad@fb.com>, Chaals from Yandex <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Message-Id: <22F48926-825D-4A3B-96F5-691FCCC07A44@mnot.net>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>

> On 21 Nov 2014, at 6:49 pm, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>> My .02 - I think this needs to be a TAG finding for visibility, but REC track has charms too; maybe a joint deliverable makes sense. Adding Dan for his thoughts.
> 
> Given that it's something that needs to be implemented, it seems
> highly inappropriate as finding.

Yes, we came to the same conclusion. I think a finding, if we produce one, would be a high-level policy-ish document; WebAppSec would define the implementation (presumably with TAG input).

See update:
  https://gist.github.com/mnot/38df717849b775eec3a4

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 23 November 2014 08:35:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:08 UTC