Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> My .02 - I think this needs to be a TAG finding for visibility, but REC track has charms too; maybe a joint deliverable makes sense. Adding Dan for his thoughts.

Given that it's something that needs to be implemented, it seems
highly inappropriate as finding.


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Friday, 21 November 2014 07:50:14 UTC