W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > November 2014

Re: Bug tracking

From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:58:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKXHy=e-XRWq9vi+2-RrQSEme5yybSbqGOy=uFgrmar6C4Lejg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Hill <hillbrad@fb.com>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>, WebAppSec WG <public-webappsec@w3.org>
I'm not a fan of Tracker, but I'd be happy with either Bugzilla or GitHub.

GitHub has nice integration with the patches we land (e.g. we can close
issues via commit messages). So long as we're using GitHub to host the
source, we're likely to get issues via GitHub regardless of our decision
here.

Bugzilla's advantage is simply that it has nice integration with specs we
depend on (like Fetch). And Anne apparently has a script we can use to make
filing bugs simpler (though I suspect it would be easily adjustable to
point to GitHub or wherever).

*shrug* Poll the group? Flip a coin?

-mike

--
Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91

Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores
(Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@fb.com> wrote:

> So, what do editors want to use?  I was leaning towards GitHub for good
> integration with commits / PRs, but just saw Mike open a bug in bugzilla
> this morning.
>
> As a chair I like tracker because of the IRC integration, and the fact
> that everyone with a w3c account who is a member is automatically
> enrolled.  But I clearly see its other limitations.
>
> Famous last words - it doesn't seem like too much work to build a GitHub
> IRC bot, if that's the tooling we definitely want to use.
>
> -Brad
>
> On 11/9/14, 9:55 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>
> wrote:
> >> Anne: Is this something we could get with the spec frameworks currently
> >> in use (e.g. ReSpec)?
> >
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/innerhtm
> >l/raw-file/tip/index.html&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=HU3cThGizwgs
> >ko8%2BWBMXZg%3D%3D%0A&m=olqJGQAZ6zBvzJmBLE4GstC%2FGqf6YyX4dlVKZ47cuc8%3D%0
> >A&s=851271685c30c8d0c17f94c47d7f25293abadb5275890ca941e1d415adeeab3c has
> >such
> >links and uses ReSpec I believe.
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://annevankesteren.nl/&k=Z
> >VNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=HU3cThGizwgsko8%2BWBMXZg%3D%3D%0A&m=olqJG
> >QAZ6zBvzJmBLE4GstC%2FGqf6YyX4dlVKZ47cuc8%3D%0A&s=555262dc01b9fa4346bd8c147
> >dbe7caa771e416a9ae29692636b028fdadb8c9c
> >
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 07:59:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:07 UTC